2 ms·

I am acknowledging that there are probably(definitely) better ways to do what I did. I'm trying to think in advance to put my own ego aside and be open to chang

by ge96 10y ago

I am acknowledging that there are probably(definitely) better ways to do what I did. I'm trying to think in advance to put my own ego aside and be open to changes. My work really isn't anything extraordinary. It's just a new thing for me to give access to something I've been working on that someone else might change completely. Still I mean it's about production, doing it right, efficiency, performance, etc... The other developer will be developing a separate area. I don't know I think I am pretty logical in my thinking on how I code/break a process down. Yeah I guess I'll have to see how it goes. Thanks for your input and the link.

ge96 10y ago
Ha I like that on that link it says "...Bulldoze the site down ..Start over..." I am kind of guilty of that when I took over this abandoned single page eCommerce thing (without the payment) that was built using bootstrap and at the time I didn't know how to use Bootstrap (still don't really). So I rebuilt what they had with scratch code, the scroll-animations the sectioning of content it wasn't a large site to rebuild but yeah that was probably dumb.
- ge96 10y ago
  Rambling alert I doubt someone would rewrite the progressive loader I developed for this area (really bad internet like 0.3Mbps) that has a 2 second max-delay "interrupter" that shows what it has so you're not thinking the page is broken. I don't know I feel pretty proud of what I made but yeah it would suck from an external person to trace though it though not really it's two blocks that loop back on to themselves before ending. Load and grab the very small 1KB images and then load the higher resolution and replace the low res ones. It could have been written better like the tiling that calculates and "perfectly" divides the screen. Yet it's not easy to decrease the width of each tiles and change the number of tiles per row. There are currently five of them. If you kept scrolling you'd end up displaying 400 images+. Anyway onwards I suppose. Rambled. Edit: I shouldn't say I doubt. Once you see how something works I think it is easier to reverse engineer it than arriving to that conclusion due to various changes. I'm actually looking to the eventual freedom of moving away from this particular project.

by ge96 10y ago

ge96 10y ago

Ha I like that on that link it says "...Bulldoze the site down ..Start over..." I am kind of guilty of that when I took over this abandoned single page eCommerce thing (without the payment) that was built using bootstrap and at the time I didn't know how to use Bootstrap (still don't really). So I rebuilt what they had with scratch code, the scroll-animations the sectioning of content it wasn't a large site to rebuild but yeah that was probably dumb.

ge96 10y ago
Rambling alert I doubt someone would rewrite the progressive loader I developed for this area (really bad internet like 0.3Mbps) that has a 2 second max-delay "interrupter" that shows what it has so you're not thinking the page is broken. I don't know I feel pretty proud of what I made but yeah it would suck from an external person to trace though it though not really it's two blocks that loop back on to themselves before ending. Load and grab the very small 1KB images and then load the higher resolution and replace the low res ones. It could have been written better like the tiling that calculates and "perfectly" divides the screen. Yet it's not easy to decrease the width of each tiles and change the number of tiles per row. There are currently five of them. If you kept scrolling you'd end up displaying 400 images+. Anyway onwards I suppose. Rambled. Edit: I shouldn't say I doubt. Once you see how something works I think it is easier to reverse engineer it than arriving to that conclusion due to various changes. I'm actually looking to the eventual freedom of moving away from this particular project.