3 ms·
>The notion that every practicing doctor has enough free time - or is even smart enough - to keep up on the latest pharmaceuticals, is ridiculous. That's part
by dikdik 10y ago
>The notion that every practicing doctor has enough free time - or is even smart enough - to keep up on the latest pharmaceuticals, is ridiculous.
That's part of the doctor's job, if they can't keep up with new medical/pharma literature then they need to find a different job. Further, most doctors know taking a ton of info from a pharma rep is just asking to be misinformed. A lot of pharma sales reps have no science background and many lie about approved populations and other aspects of a drug (just see the many, many lawsuits out there).
- refurb 10y agoThat's part of the doctor's job, if they can't keep up with new medical/pharma literature then they need to find a different job. Do you know any doctors? Have you talked to them about how they spend their days? Most want to maximize the time they spend with patients. Any way they can keep up to date on the latest technology is helpful.
- dikdik 10y agoYes, I know a TON of doctors and used to work very closely with about 50 of them. Well the solution to your problem is not to inundate them with misleading or false information from someone whose entire base of scientific knowledge comes from employer-led seminars. The solution would be to train more doctors, so they have more time with patients AND can be more effective physicians.
- refurb 10y agofrom someone whose entire base of scientific knowledge comes from employer-led seminars You forgot to add that the scientific information is limited to the FDA approved label.
- dikdik 10y agoWhile it should be, it's not. There has been lawsuit after lawsuit of pharma reps that promote off label uses of drugs among many more egregious acts (typically at the behest of the pharma companies).
- gech 10y ago>Any way Bribes?