5 ms·
> The're VM's They are definitely not VMs. > But they're really, really efficient compared to VM's. I think that the virtualisation CPU overhead is below 1%.
by kerny 10y ago
> The're VM's
They are definitely not VMs.
> But they're really, really efficient compared to VM's.
I think that the virtualisation CPU overhead is below 1%. Layered file systems are possible with virtual machines as well so disk space usage could be comparable.
What do you mean that they are "really, really efficient" ?
- RantyDave 9y ago5-10%, realistically, with some very informal testing. Not really a particularly big deal. Really really efficient relates to how many containers can be run on a given system vs VM's. About 10x as many.