4 ms·
It's startling how much the current era reminds me of the late 1800s/early 1900s, as well as how little that era was focused on in my history classes. We jumped
by bbctol 10y ago
It's startling how much the current era reminds me of the late 1800s/early 1900s, as well as how little that era was focused on in my history classes. We jumped from the Civil War to World War 1 pretty quickly, with scarce attention paid to the social upheaval and long, often violent struggles between workers, governments, and the upper classes. Nowadays, we act as if the Industrial Revolution evolved into shared prosperity naturally; we mock the Luddites, the utopians, the Communists for being unable to see how the disruption caused by technology would lead to positive outcomes. But these outcomes took a long time, were not inevitable, and they did not come from capitalism alone; they were fought for, every step of the way, in a long, complicated, morally ambiguous struggle to shape the new world. We seem to be entering another age of disruption, and would do well to look back on the previous one to understand what was fought for and why.
- TheAdamAndChe 10y agoIn a global economy, governments don't have the leverage required to keep the capitalists in check. The US still has its environmental and labor laws, but because corporations can ship the work over to countries whose people are willing to work for $0.40/hr, our labor laws don't mean a thing. We really need to take a good hard look at globalism.
- gnaritas 10y ago> We really need to take a good hard look at globalism. Or capitalism in a global economy.
- TheAdamAndChe 10y agoCapitalism can exist without exploiting foreign labor.
- gnaritas 10y agoNot without shutting down free trade agreements and becoming protectionist, which virtually everyone agrees is a bad idea.