4 ms·
That is far less then the bonuses received by some individual bankers who only received them because their banks were bailed out by taxpayers, in the EU and els
by vfclists 10y ago
That is far less then the bonuses received by some individual bankers who only received them because their banks were bailed out by taxpayers, in the EU and elsewhere, which I presume includes some of the inhabitants of Eigg.
- thecopy 10y agoWhy is that revelant?
- vfclists 10y agoBecause egregious misuses of public funds don't get the attention they deserve. How does a subsidy of £1.66 million for an investment which serves a whole community compare with a single payment for the personal consumption of an individual who belongs to a group whose acts have resulted in economic depression for the last 10 years?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- JBReefer 10y agoI don't see how that's relevant. It's also less than some 1 bed apartments in London, and it's more than 4357 people in the Congo make in a year. It just seems like agenda pushing.