3 ms·
Well when I started programming Windows 3.1 it was with Microsoft C 7 and the help of the Petzold book. At that time it seemed to be the main way of writing Win
by discreteevent 10y ago
Well when I started programming Windows 3.1 it was with Microsoft C 7 and the help of the Petzold book. At that time it seemed to be the main way of writing Windows programs, at least until Visual Basic 3 came out anyway. It wasn't just another programming language in the Windows world. It was the programming language.
- pjmlp 10y agoI was using Turbo Pascal for Windows 1.5 and Borland C++ 3.1 instead. Also by the time Windows 3.1 got out MS-DOS was already at version MS-DOS 5.0 and DR-DOS at version 6.0. During the lifetime of MS-DOS, many of us were happily coding on Clipper, Dbase, Turbo Pascal, Turbo Basic, Quick Pascal, TMT Pascal, FoxPro, NASM, TASM, Turbo C, Turbo C++, Modula-2.... There was plenty of choice.
- discreteevent 10y agoNot to be pedantic but I know there was a lot of choice for DOS but I was referring to Windows programming specifically which is what I started out on. I was under the impression that C was the main way to do this but I didn't even have access to the internet then, so I suppose I should say that it seemed to be the main way to do Windows programming in my local area and in my local computer bookshop!
- bluGill 10y agoYou are looking at the 1990s, not the 1970s and early 1980s when this was taking place. By the late 1980s Microsoft realized they needed a higher level language and C was already winning by then. Microsoft just helped push it along.