> You are reading things into my comments. You appear to have forgotten to read your first comment: "This thread may grow long and maybe turn to the topic of

> You are reading things into my comments. You appear to have forgotten to read your first comment: "This thread may grow long and maybe turn to the topic of HTTPS. SSL with SNI exposes plaintext hostnames/domainnames on the wire for anyone to read, aggregate and sell, not to mention tamper with. It should be an optional extension. For many users it adds no benefit. For some users, it breaks their software and adds needless complexity. Now the privacy advocates have a reason to dislike it too. Just say no to SNI." The grammatical form of the last sentence is called imperative[0]. It is not a misnomer. The previous sentence quantifies over "privacy advocates". The first tells people who are not you what to do, the previous one tells people who are not you what they have reason to believe. You were the first person "telling others what software to use" in this thread. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperative_mood https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperative_mood