5 ms·
Assume for the sake of argument that you agree it is a harmful feature for Google's image in the long term. In that case does making it an optional feature make
by staunch 16y ago
Assume for the sake of argument that you agree it is a harmful feature for Google's image in the long term. In that case does making it an optional feature make any difference, beyond minimizing the damage?
- lallysingh 16y agoYup -- if it wasn't optional, it'd expose their choice to many more users.
- w1ntermute 16y agoMaking it optional isn't "minimizing the damage", it's making a feature available to people who see it as a _positive thing_. This will improve Google's image in the eyes of its users, not harm it.