3 ms·
Yes, but racket is a terrible language to work with. I've mentioned for years that drracket needs a general sexpr mode and integrated terminal for something lik
by killin_dan 10y ago
Yes, but racket is a terrible language to work with. I've mentioned for years that drracket needs a general sexpr mode and integrated terminal for something like geiser. They don't listen.
I am working on a general purpose solution, but I'm just one person. And I don't leverage public dollars to write bad tools from the safety of university, so that slows it down a bit.
- peatmoss 10y ago> racket is a terrible language to work with. > ... > I don't leverage public dollars to write bad tools That's, like, your opinion, man! Further, if your habit is to make feature requests in combination with this kind of subjective disparagement, I can see why the Racket community didn't jump to implement your request. Lighten up. Everyone here is on the same team.
- killin_dan 10y agoDefinitely not the same team. I never crawled to them and asked them. I've mentioned itd be a good feature, they decided to rewrite window management over and over again. Can't help that. The racket community includes disgusting transvestites and a bunch of cucked out and Guy Steele wannabes. Very little talent, lots of public dollars to spend rewriting things nobody ever had trouble with. Now they want to reimplement all of racket in chez. They prove me right more consistently than any other project I criticize.
- sctb 10y agoThis comment seriously violates the guidelines around civility and name calling, and is just nasty besides. If you'd like to continue to post on Hacker News you can't do this again.
- killin_dan 10y agoI prefer to be ruthlessly censored and have my narrative controlled by dang. Is he available?