4 ms·
> taxes already on the books that they might have previously unintentionally evaded. I agree with Grover Norquist. It might be counter intuitive but I would ra
by bingomad123 10y ago
> taxes already on the books that they might have previously unintentionally evaded.
I agree with Grover Norquist. It might be counter intuitive but I would rather leave it to Turbo-tax to figure out the details than signing the form sent to me by IRS. Let IRS do the extra work of catching me if they think I am filing fraudulent taxes.
Grover Norquist's view might be counter-intuitive but I a agree with him.
- hyperbovine 10y agoThat's it, blame TurboTax.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- eli_gottlieb 10y agoYou can refer to TurboTax all you like, but you just basically admitted that you're committing tax fraud and challenging society to catch you.
- jnordwick 10y agoI think the point is that there are many grey areas, and the IRS is likely to come down the side of more taxes while the third party is likely to try more on your behalf.
- bingomad123 10y agoTax fraud is a super gray area. I will be surprised to find any person who has not violated IRS regulation.
- socialist_coder 10y agoOk, is anything in this proposal preventing you from using Turbo-tax, your accountant, or just doing it yourself by hand? No one is forcing you to use the IRS pre-filled form. What is the problem? Let the "idiots" pay extra taxes if they want and smart guys like you can spend extra time and money doing your taxes the old way.
- bingomad123 10y agoWell, the problem with what happens what government has pre-filled on the form differs from my interpretation! As a matter of principle I am even opposed to tax deductions at source. Each individual must sign a check at the end of the year/month and pay taxes. This makes sure he feels the pinch.