3 ms·
Wow, there are so many interesting bits here that I felt compelled to comment on some: 1. "... they gave thanks that they were permitted to see so much, and be
by Jun8 10y ago
Wow, there are so many interesting bits here that I felt compelled to comment on some:
1. "... they gave thanks that they were permitted to see so much, and begged forgiveness for their desire to see more.” When I discover with mind-blowing physical discovery (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hercules%E2%80%93Corona_Borealis_Great_Wall https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hercules%E2%80%93Corona_Boreal...) I sometimes feel this way about humanity's great foray into the universe.
2. "He writes the science fiction that would have existed in an earlier era, had science existed then." I interpret this to be a very insightful comment on what SF is. Some people take SF to be inventing stuff, humans always did that sort of thing through mythology (in fact one can argue that in the past we had much more of it and science kills it). OTOH I think the real SF is taking a scientific framework and tweaking parts of it what-ifs to demonstrate aspects of humanity, in way any other work of literature operates. This does require science.
3. "Chiang’s vision of a world without faith, in which the certain and proven existence of God is troubling, rather than reassuring." This is absolutely true, if the existence of God were to be proven beyond doubt (which, if you think about it seems paradoxical) existence would be intolerable, much more so than if the reverse was proven.
4. "I believe that the universe is deterministic, but that the most meaningful definition of free will is compatible with determinism”. Spot on! "We must believe in free will -- we have no choice." - Isaac Bashevis Singer
5. “There’s a book by Umberto Eco called ‘The Search for the Perfect Language,’ ” he said. Great book that I would recommend to anyone.
6. "In “Understand,” he pointed out, the protagonist learns to reprogram his own mind." After finishing Snow Crash I have been thinking that some form of brain hacking should be possible using light pulses and linguistics as input (http://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/11187/are-the-language-elements-in-snow-crash-supported-by-science http://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/11187/are-the-langu...).
Altogether an amazing guy, ordering his books from Amazon right now.
- nkrisc 10y agoUnderstand was a wonderful. I thought it perfectly encapsulated the inevitable outcome of such a scenario.
- mirimir 10y ago> the protagonist learns to reprogram his own mind You'd want a backup before trying anything substantial.
- M_Grey 10y agoWell, it didn't seem to bother Juanita Martinez too much.
- smallnamespace 10y agoProbably, but it doesn't protect you against bad edge cases, like screwing with your own mind so much that you no longer can or want to activate the backup.
- mirimir 10y agoThose are interesting issues. The answer, I guess, would be to only work on copies. But even then, nuking a copy of yourself would be troubling.
- adrianN 10y agoKind of like when you could set your screen resolution to a value that wasn't supported by your screen and it didn't reset automatically after 30 seconds.