>Germany does what you described. They are so green they emit more CO2 since they went green. In case people are curious about this claim the reason Germany's

>Germany does what you described. They are so green they emit more CO2 since they went green. In case people are curious about this claim the reason Germany's "renewable energy" releases so much CO2 is because a large portion of their 'renewable energy' is burning wood. Burning wood isn't "net neutral" until trees live over 100 years. Until then, it's worse than coal. http://www.pfpi.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/PFPI-Biomass-is-the-New-Coal-April-2-2014.pdf http://www.pfpi.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/PFPI-Biomass-... Most tree farms don't let trees grow 100 years either. >Based on consumption trends in our region, using wood to generate power here or to make fuel pellets for power generation in Europe is projected to produce higher levels of atmospheric carbon(300%) than fossil fuels for 35 to 50 years. After that time, carbon levels will begin to fall as regrowing forests absorb CO2 from previous combustion, but it is likely too late to avoid irreversible effects on the climate system. https://www.southernenvironment.org/cases-and-projects/biomass-energy-in-the-south https://www.southernenvironment.org/cases-and-projects/bioma...