3 ms·
You'll always need intelligent humans using your product to tell you what to optimise for. An optimisation is almost always a trade-off and you'll need your end
by AndrewOMartin 10y ago
You'll always need intelligent humans using your product to tell you what to optimise for. An optimisation is almost always a trade-off and you'll need your end users to tell you what's ok to sacrifice. For example, I expect my mum would trade about 50% of the processing power of her phone to get 10% more battery life, but the most important feature of her phone right now is that it's white so it's easier to find in her bag.
My point is that you can't just tell a machine to go optimise. You need to tell it what to optimise and that's often a complex indeterminate culturally specific interaction between poorly defined attributes.
- zardo 10y agoI think the direction is generating designs so quickly that the 'designer' is essentially exploring a design space manifold in realtime. You'll still need someone to do it, but I think designers are going to get the kind of boost in productivity that accountants got from spreadsheets. Whether that translates to fewer designers, or more and better designed things... I suspect the latter.