3 ms·
There's nothing in principle that stops a machine from creating art. Even, better art than any person could do. So once that happens, where are we left? We don
by panic 10y ago
There's nothing in principle that stops a machine from creating art. Even, better art than any person could do. So once that happens, where are we left?
We don't have to wonder -- it has already happened: http://the-best-art.computer http://the-best-art.computer
- hutzlibu 10y agoYou read your own link? There is not much art there which the computer is doing.
- Rotareti 10y agoI think this is a funny project.. but the description is totally exaggerated: > The computer queries the universe and uses an algorithm to objectively calculate the best art for any given moment in time. The human executes the commands. How is this objectively at all? The artist creates an algo and picks some stuff to query. All the artist does is adding another (subjectively formed) layer to the process. > The computer's creative process is computational, and therefore unbiased. :-/ > How do you know it actually produces the "best" art? Good art pulls meaning from the chaos of the universe, and also reflects the artist's unique point of view. The computer rigorously combines these two factors in its programming, optimizing them to produce the best art. I find this very arrogant to say... > There's nothing in principle that stops a machine from creating art. Even, better art than any person could do. I don't think this project would be an example.
- idanoeman 10y agoI think it was a joke...