> The arbitration courts are more contentious. I'm not sure exactly why they're necessary, or what alternatives there might be there. If you agree there should

> The arbitration courts are more contentious. I'm not sure exactly why they're necessary, or what alternatives there might be there. If you agree there should be rules, you must also agree there should be a court for arbitration. Of course the countries could use their local courts, but courts are hierarchial for a reason. Unless one country decides to subject itself to the other countries supreme court, it seems that an independent court is needed for the deal?