4 ms·
The election was hacked because implying there was no outside force would imply there was an internal problem. An internal problem such as an unelectable candi
by VLM 10y ago
The election was hacked because implying there was no outside force would imply there was an internal problem. An internal problem such as an unelectable candidate being selected by a faulty biased selection process. Or the legacy regional alliances being shattered. Perhaps long cherished beliefs and ideals and slogans are simply obsolete, dead in the voting marketplace. Or the impact of demographic trends. Or simple utter gross incompetence of individual party leadership. Extremely painful questions need to be asked if the loss was not due to Russian Hacking.
Therefore the powers that be, declare the only problem with the election at any level was Russian Hacking. Its a thought crime directly attacking the existing party leadership to consider is could be anything else. Would you go up against the DNC? They own TV and radio and newspapers and many websites, you'd be a fool to do anything but nod your head in agreement and repeat after them that the DNC did nothing wrong and the only problem was Russian Hacking.
You're not going to see the R party disagreeing, other than trolling and LOLz, because a profoundly dysfunctional D party directly benefits them next time. Imagine the R party perspective, sure guys, do the same thing that didn't work plus more WW3 warmongering against Russia, how could the R party not win against that again?
Don't hurt anyone's feelings, whatever you do, blame the Russian Hackers.
- boomboomsubban 10y agoThe "election" was unambiguously hacked, you can argue that the democrats are blaming it more than is reasonable, but it happened. Basically the only thing getting a budget increase this year looks to be the military. War isn't started over stern reprimands, increasing military spending and increasing our ties to Russia seem to be the more likely sign of an upcoming war.