5 ms·
Don't hold your breath. Part of the article is about how courts are upholding these interpretations of electronic surveillance laws.
by jorgeortiz85 16y ago
Don't hold your breath. Part of the article is about how courts are upholding these interpretations of electronic surveillance laws.
- jrockway 16y agoWhy not record the police with a hand-cranked film camera? If no electronic devices are in use, how could electronic surveillance laws apply?
- jacquesm 16y agoGood luck getting your film developed! Also, undeveloped film tends to meet with 'accidental overexposure' when confiscated, even if only temporarily.
- jrockway 16y agoPolaroid.
- jacquesm 16y agoDid polaroid ever make motion picture film ?
- jrockway 16y agoSounds expensive, so probably not. Either way, I think that photographic documentation is better than no documentation at all.
- URSpider94 16y agoTotally off-topic, but YES, they did. It was called Polavision, and the reason you've never heard of it is because VHS and Beta came onto the scene at pretty much the same time, rendering it virtually irrelevant. Many photography historians peg the Polavision project as "the beginning of the end" for Polaroid, because it used up so many engineering resources that could have been used to improve their still-camera instant products. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polavision,_Polachrome_and_Polapan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polavision,_Polachrome_and_Pola... for more information.
- jacquesm 16y agoCool, that's really neat, thanks for digging that up!
- f1gm3nt 16y agoCould get a digital camera and set it to take a picture every 1 second. Some do this, but only will take 3 or 4 shoots.
- MartinCron 16y agoI'm hoping that this goes all the way to the federal supreme court and gets settled once and for all.