3 ms·
In Richard Branson's book he makes a big deal about keeping detailed notes of meetings, and how useful he's found the practice to be over his career its really
by pitt1980 10y ago
In Richard Branson's book he makes a big deal about keeping detailed notes of meetings, and how useful he's found the practice to be over his career
its really probably a very underrated habit, especially as a new, low on the totem pole person
it probably makes you a very useful gatekeeper of the information flow
the process of doing it probably reinforces the information flow into your brain for useful future brainstorming (it forces you to pay attention)
also it gives you the basis for which you can influence future decisions "On (so and so date), according to my notes we said we wanted to do X, so now we should do Y"
-----------
a suggestion,
run how people's ideas are presented in your notes to them directly, before you distributed them to the wider audience
"I'm trying to get the meeting notes together, this is how I have what you said about Y, do you mind looking at to make sure it accurately captures what you were saying?"
"That's not what I said" or, more likely, "That's not what I meant" is a good way to create dysfunction where none needs to exist
- gregmac 10y agoI am a big fan of meeting notes in a wiki, (nearly) immediately published for everyone to see. "That's not what I said/meant": okay great, go edit the page and clarify.
- walshemj 10y agoNO edit wars for meeting minutes are a BAD thing any errors or omissions should be addressd in the next meeting
- ams6110 10y agoYes, only the secretary (or official minute-taker) should be allowed to change the text of the minutes, and once "approved" the minutes should be read-only. Corrections can be submitted to the secretary by email in advance as a convenience.
- gregmac 10y agoI've never had an edit war problem on meeting minutes.
- walshemj 10y agoI think that is because of his dyslexia and poor short term memory