4 ms·
> one is expected to work AT LEAST as hard is required for subsistence farming on an average 8-acre lot. Are you proposing then that every person should start
by baursak 10y ago
> one is expected to work AT LEAST as hard is required for subsistence farming on an average 8-acre lot.
Are you proposing then that every person should start from that baseline, say from age 18, and any wealth accumulated by their parents not made available to them?
> This notion that the capable idle should be sustained, thru the confiscation of at least that much productivity from others, for the mere act of breathing is preposterous.
Are you describing idle rich here as well?
Relevant: https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/61zjqf/meritocracy/ https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/61zjqf...
- ctdonath 10y agoWay to wantonly misconstrue my point. I mean, that's really a concerted attempt to make me a strawman. In no way do I contend everyone should, compulsorily, start from that exact baseline. If someone wishes to share the fruit of their productivity with you, fine - that's basically a contract between the two of you, and none of anyone else's business. The "idle rich" are plainly not what I meant. They achieved (and exceeded) baseline productivity somehow; again, so long as it's either the direct result of their efforts, or otherwise the fruit of a mutually-agreed contract, they've done their part to not be an unnecessary burden on others. The "capable idle" are those who could work and sustain themselves, but opt not to because they leverage a system of coercive redistribution based on police power of the state. I do think if you're going to have a government-mandated education system, it should prepare every child to be capable of starting from that baseline, should ill circumstance befall them.