95 ms·

It is sad to see some HNers flag this report. This was submitted 46 minutes ago and it is ranked #45 with 5 votes. Meanwhile, at #39 is "Japanese researche fi

by credo 10y ago

It is sad to see some HNers flag this report. This was submitted 46 minutes ago and it is ranked #45 with 5 votes. Meanwhile, at #39 is "Japanese researche firms part of global effort to develop spray-on solar panels" with just 3 votes (and submitted more than two hours ago). Btw I'm referencing #39 for ranking comparison purposes, I have nothing against that item.

pjc50 10y ago
HN ranking is very strange. But in some ways this is "old news"; Apple consistently refuse to allow what they deem to be "political" content on their App Store. Personally I strongly disagree with this kind of Maoism, but they have absolutely no intention of changing it, the public aren't going to boycott them for it, and the US government aren't going to force them to change it.
- choko 10y ago
  Out of curiosity, why should the government force them to change that policy?
  - pjc50 10y ago
    It's hard to construct an argument that they should, other than reaching for "common carrier" status or some kind of anti-trust. To the extent that they're acting as a "publisher" they can publish what they like. But it's still strange that Microsoft is forced to put in browser choice (and in some jurisdictions media player choice, I think), while Apple get to be a platform-monopolist. The usual argument against this is the non-dominance of the iPhone; so long as Android is the most popular OS and allows some choice of stores, I don't think anyone's successfully going to make a case against Apple.
    - kalleboo 10y ago
      Both the browser choice, and the "N editions" (without media player) were in the EU/EEA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp_v_Commission https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp_v_Commission https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrowserChoice.eu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrowserChoice.eu
mclightning 10y ago
This seems to be happening more and more. It is even more noticeable if you are using a HN reader 3rd party app like me.

by credo 10y ago

pjc50 10y ago

HN ranking is very strange. But in some ways this is "old news"; Apple consistently refuse to allow what they deem to be "political" content on their App Store. Personally I strongly disagree with this kind of Maoism, but they have absolutely no intention of changing it, the public aren't going to boycott them for it, and the US government aren't going to force them to change it.

choko 10y ago
Out of curiosity, why should the government force them to change that policy?
- pjc50 10y ago
  It's hard to construct an argument that they should, other than reaching for "common carrier" status or some kind of anti-trust. To the extent that they're acting as a "publisher" they can publish what they like. But it's still strange that Microsoft is forced to put in browser choice (and in some jurisdictions media player choice, I think), while Apple get to be a platform-monopolist. The usual argument against this is the non-dominance of the iPhone; so long as Android is the most popular OS and allows some choice of stores, I don't think anyone's successfully going to make a case against Apple.
  - kalleboo 10y ago
    Both the browser choice, and the "N editions" (without media player) were in the EU/EEA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp_v_Commission https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp_v_Commission https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrowserChoice.eu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrowserChoice.eu

mclightning 10y ago

This seems to be happening more and more. It is even more noticeable if you are using a HN reader 3rd party app like me.