4 ms·
I like this idea - but why do you let people edit the .wav part of the extension? That was super counterintuitive to me could I have done .mp3 for example? I'l
by tommynicholas 10y ago
I like this idea - but why do you let people edit the .wav part of the extension? That was super counterintuitive to me could I have done .mp3 for example?
I'll leave any other feedback I have here unless you have an email I can send it to - I've been looking for a good web version of Hum (the mobile app) and this looks like it could be it + more!
- myzie 10y agoHey there, thanks for trying it out. Was this after uploading a wav then clicking to edit its tags or file name? I'll see if I can improve that aspect. In general, Sawtooth transcodes uploads behind the scenes to create mp3 and opus encoded versions so that they can be streamed to your browser (not all browsers support playing wav directly). These versions are all stored next to each other. Editing the name string in the UI shouldn't be able to change file extensions in the backend. I'd be happy to field any other questions here or equally you can reach me at curtis at sawtooth.io