Well, then I just misunderstood you. I should probably better have quoted this sentence in my last comment. So to me, that doesn't suggest that something "trav

Well, then I just misunderstood you. I should probably better have quoted this sentence in my last comment. So to me, that doesn't suggest that something "traveled" to the other box, just like in the Classical version. I read this as you saying nothing travels from the measurement to the entangled partner. But this is what happens, »Someone just looked inside me and saw heads, please show tails when someone looks inside you!« travels from the measurement to the entangled partner. And if that happens instantaneously, then this is a non-local effect. That is why I thought you wanted to say nothing travels, neither slowly nor instantaneously and therefore non-locally.