3 ms·
I tried to set this straight in my comment. Charlie does not get to choose the fruit, the fruit is chosen at random. I just allowed Charlie to make the choice t
by danbruc 10y ago
I tried to set this straight in my comment. Charlie does not get to choose the fruit, the fruit is chosen at random. I just allowed Charlie to make the choice to emphasize that the choice happens outside of the room. Had I just said the choice happens at random, then it would not be obvious why this random choice could not also be made in the room with Alice. But then we were back at Bob leaving the room with either an apple or a pear.
Have I look at my other comment with coins in boxes [1], that picture captures the situation better and in a way that is not easily translated to fruits.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13981054 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13981054
- beojan 10y ago> I just allowed Charlie to make the choice to emphasize that the choice happens outside of the room. The problem is that allowing Charlie to make the choice allows him to use entanglement to transmit information faster than the speed of light.
- nonbel 10y agoI think, as others have pointed out, these analogies just aren't perfect enough. Do you know where I can find a data source for one of these tests? I checked a few recent papers from wikipedia but they only reported (very high level) summary statistics.