3 ms·
I've seen reviews comparing clinical-decision-support-systems, which advise doctors on diagnosis and treatment and the machines did better. There's also some r
by petra 10y ago
I've seen reviews comparing clinical-decision-support-systems, which advise doctors on diagnosis and treatment and the machines did better.
There's also some research, in general , about the resistance of doctors to such systems. And yes while some of the reasons are UI, some are motivated by doctors preferences.
And even if the UI is a bit slow, we should at least seen such systems common in the more critical settings, or just with vulnerable or complex patients.
- carbocation 10y agoYes, I've tried to use clinical decision tools for complex cases. They aren't integrated into our EHR (which is the most common EHR), so inputting the data for a case takes between 10-15 minutes. That's as much time as I get to see a patient at an outpatient visit. I'm a doctor. I'd be delighted to have decision support for every problem. As it stands I have decision support for medication dosing and for appropriate use of imaging, both of which are very helpful. Don't blame the customer for not buying if the product is not good.
- petra 10y agoThere's isabel healthcare's CDSS, the interface seems rapid and one of the reviewers("sprecher") says that he can use it in a patient visit: http://www.isabelhealthcare.com/customer-satisfaction/testimonials http://www.isabelhealthcare.com/customer-satisfaction/testim... Could be just marketing, but maybe. There's a free test. if you do test, please share your opinion of it, it's interesting.