4 ms·
I was a little curious about the detail of this, since I didn't really know what Square offers beyond being a 'payments company' (which could mean anything). I
by GlennS 10y ago
I was a little curious about the detail of this, since I didn't really know what Square offers beyond being a 'payments company' (which could mean anything).
It seems that they're claiming to be cheaper for small businesses. Is that true? Their per-transaction fee seems pretty high, and their device is about the same price as a chip and pin reader.
They also have mobile payment support, but surely that's just a gimmick at this point?
- untog 10y agoGiven the proliferation of tap and pay in the UK, I can't help but think any other "mobile payment" solution is dead in the water.
- Nursie 10y agoMobile payment like apple pay and android? No, it's a growing sector. It also mostly comes for free once you have contactless in place. Their offering seems to be more than just a card reader, they bundle a PoS app too. Not saying it's the best thing since sliced bread, but it does seem like a fairly complete package. edit - can I ask why I got a downvote? Not sure I said anything contentious there.
- falsedan 10y agoEvery card in the UK issued in the last few years can be used for contactless payments, and every sandwich shop has a chip-and-pin handset which can process them. I added the one card which doesn't support contactless to my iPhone wallet but being able to use my debit card is much easier (plus I don't have to worry about draining its battery).
- Nursie 10y agoNot every card, my credit card did not, for whatever reason. There may be better security through Apple/Android pay, IIRC they don't expose a real card number, and the phone must be awake (and sometimes unlocked) to process a payment. Regardless, it's irrelevant - the processing tech for android/apple pay is the same as for other contactless cards, so it comes for free - lots of places supported it without even knowing. That sandwich shop reader already supports phone payments most likely. I like it - saves me fiddling with my wallet.
- falsedan 10y agoMy point is, consumers already expect to use their card, not a phone/app; and for users who do have the necessary hardware, it's still about as convenient to use their card rather than their phone.
- Nursie 10y agoSo, some consumers now like to use their phone, I personally find it more convenient. As an extra capability that appeals to some folks it's a no-brainer to market it as a feature. Sure, it's probably only a few percent at present. Your objection seems to be "I don't use that, therefore they shouldn't mention it on their page", no?
- falsedan 10y ago> I don't use that, therefore they shouldn't mention it on their page Oops, that's not my intended message at all! I don't care what they say on their site & I certainly don't expect them to pay attention to the rants of random HN commentators… I know people don't use their phone to pay for things here, and I don't understand why you think it will help Square make any inroads into the UK market.
- Nursie 10y agoI don't understand why people object to it as a marketing selling point - it's a new(ish) payment method that's expected to become more widespread over time. Selling your product to a retailer with "Hey, it does this too" can't be a bad thing? >> I know people don't use their phone to pay for things here Where is here? I've seen folks in London using their phone to pass the Oyster/underground gates, and I see people at work use their phones every day in the on-site eatery. When I brandish my phone at the McDonald's drive-through for a coffee, the staff don't look at me like I'm crazy, they hold out the machine. I'm really not sure why you think that it's objectionable.
- falsedan 10y ago