>that reputation is undermining the credibility of the US legal system as a whole. Once someone studies the impact of wealth on outcome of court cases, such as

>that reputation is undermining the credibility of the US legal system as a whole. Once someone studies the impact of wealth on outcome of court cases, such as the difference between hiring a good lawyer and getting a public defender, is there anyone who still thinks of the US legal system as credible? I think of it as a pay to win system with a monopoly on violence that is a threat to anyone caught up in it. I've seen poor people completely destroyed for far lesser crimes that what rich people are allowed to walk with. Once you count in stacking charges to force plea deals, and the rate at which plea deals happen, how can anyone defend seeing any credibility left in the system?