Hmm as I understand it they are suing for the fact that the person is downloading the unauthorized copy (i.e. suing the peers). As to suing seeds; I guess the a

Hmm as I understand it they are suing for the fact that the person is downloading the unauthorized copy (i.e. suing the peers). As to suing seeds; I guess the argument is that they have made the copy available - are facilitating the transmission of a copyrighted works. Bearing in mind how P2P works Im not sure I understand why they would have to download 18,000 copies? The whole point of P2P is that you can download 1 copy from 18,000 [sic] people :) (I don't agree with their argument in the slightest but what you've said doesn't appear to sync up with what is being argued)