5 ms·
Here is my annoyance with AI Hype: people seeking extra tailwinds pitch their startups as "ML companies" even with the most tangential usage of ML. It drowns o
by TuringNYC 10y ago
Here is my annoyance with AI Hype: people seeking extra tailwinds pitch their startups as "ML companies" even with the most tangential usage of ML. It drowns out real ML companies. Most people cannot tell the difference.
At a hackathon recently, someone pitched their app as an "ML-driven app" though the only ML in there was some 1-line language translation feature they were consuming off Watson REST services for a tangential feature on their app.
Meanwhile, my submission actually used a self-trained CNN on a custom dataset using TensorFlow and changes to start/end layers on the NN. The image classification features were the core of the app and it wasn't something that was just a wrapper over an Off-the-shelf API. We actually tried multiple networks and went thru the trouble of parameterizing everything.
At the end, I wonder how many judges actually understood the difference in effort/value to the two attempts at ML.
- AndrewKemendo 10y agoDifficulty level 1: The only ML in there was some 1-line language translation feature they were consuming off Watson REST services for a tangential feature on their app Difficulty level 2: Self-trained CNN on a custom dataset using TensorFlow and changes to start/end layers on the NN Difficulty level 3: Custom rolled 12 layer CNN trained with with novel hand labeled data. How many people to you think know the difference between these and the fact that each step is a magnitude or more harder than the last? That's not even getting into trying to apply research grade stuff.
- wolf84 10y agoI got tensorflow to analyze blutooth signals off a wireless controller. talk about dreamland autoaim
- wolf84 10y agoyou know, something like thumbs as a correlation
- erkkie 10y agoWhy should people be able to tell the difference vs the outcome of those products, unless someone (investors?) is specifically just buying into the AI hype itself? (in which case, this is nothing different from when everything was "social")
- TuringNYC 10y agoI'm not saying people should be able to tell the difference, nor am I discounting the value of the final outcome. Just that pitching an app as ML-driven, when it is barely 1% ML-driven is deceptive and mis-informs the public. Consider taking the side mirror from a Ferrari, putting it on a Ford Escort, and then pitching the Ford Escort as a race-car. The Ford Escort may be a great family car, but it is not a sports car. People who don't know the difference might come to think of it as a sports car, and might even question the wisdom of spending money on a Ferrari.
- dragonwriter 10y agoIf that 1% is essential to the purpose of the app, it seems reasonable no matter what % of the code of the app it represents.
- TuringNYC 10y agoGoing along with my racecar example...the side view mirrors are essential...so does that make the Ford Escort a racecar?
- dragonwriter 10y agoThe analogy doesn't work, because "racecar" isn't a technology used in the side mirrors.
- erkkie 10y agoI get (and perhaps even agree) to the sentiment, logically at least, but realistically all marketing is deceptive. It's pragmatically more useful to understand the how's and why's of that and play along.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- _pmf_ 10y ago> even with the most tangential usage of ML What, basic linear regression is not cutting edge enough for you?
- ernestbro 10y agoI'd say you can build real "ML-driven apps"using only APIs - I disagree that you have to build it all from scratch
- barrkel 10y agoEffort doesn't have much relationship with value. Nor does the complexity of the core tech. People don't pay for implementation details; geek points don't mean prizes. Effort where it maximizes return, leveraging existing assets where possible, to solve problems for real customers, is what's valuable. Newly built tech is a rapidly depreciating asset; the depreciation comes not only from the progressing state of the art elsewhere, but also in maintenance costs and lack of network effects. Open sourcing to offset the depreciation is risky too.
- make3 10y agohackathons prizes are bullshit, didn't you know
- TuringNYC 10y agoI wasn't at the hackathon for the prize, but to find enthusiastic developers to recruit for employment, those that aren't usually found through traditional searches.
- ramblerman 10y agoYour focus on "effort" and "real" sounds a bit exclusive at the behest of your own job security. The ML boom (specifically DL) is so interesting because of the applications. Computers recognising images better than humans for instance. Surely outside of academia its a means to an end like anything else. If Team A wires together some high level Keras components with 30 lines of code, and does something really cool with it, is it less valuable?
- prvnsmpth 10y agoIf said team uses Keras as just a black-box, I would argue that it is. Not having intimate knowledge of the complex algorithms that you employ to build your services is not exactly an ideal situation to be in. If things doesn't work as expected, you can't just look it up on Stack Overflow, for instance.