How; normally I would agree but this is not exactly easily cite-able.... (i.e. how good is MS security...) Tom would seem to count as an original/authoritative

How; normally I would agree but this is not exactly easily cite-able.... (i.e. how good is MS security...) Tom would seem to count as an original/authoritative/primary source :) (when the counter citation is completely off the point I think that says something important)