3 ms·

I'm sorry I'm not quite following could you explain a bit what you mean?

• girvo 10y ago
  I think they mean that if Dries says the real reason, it will be seen as discrimination and thus Dries might be liable, perhaps?
  • protomyth 10y ago
    He's only liable if the information is provable false.
    • walshemj 10y ago
      No if they don't follow procedures you can still be liable its how preps get off if cops don't maintain a proper chain of custody for evidence
      • protomyth 10y ago
        Dries is a cop? Chain of custody is a law enforcement problem not a normal person problem.
        • walshemj 10y ago
          Ah up to a point if something goes to court they will follow custom and practice i.e. there should be an appeal follow the laws of natural justice and the opposing Lawyer will attack and try to destroy you on a personal and professional level This is direct from a senior Labour lawyer I know think a shorter Malcom Tucker
• walshemj 10y ago
  Probably we fucked up and would get crucified if it came out