4 ms·

For #3, I say skip jQuery and go with Vanilla JavaScript ala https://javascript30.com https://javascript30.com Every green browser have pretty good JavaScript

• marknadal 10y ago
  This looks great!! Will have to peek at it more myself. As you can tell, I'm a vanilla fan myself. Although I do think the DOM is still unnecessarily verbose - that aside, `innerText` still is not cross browser, so for that reason alone I recommend jQuery `$("#id").text("foo")` to discourage use of `.innerHTML` :( .
  • duderific 10y ago
    To my mind, using innerHTML is far better than including a 32K library just to avoid using it.
  • Rumudiez 10y ago
    Why is innerText not cross browser? According to caniuse it's been in every major version of every popular browser for over a year.[0] [0] http://caniuse.com/#search=innerText http://caniuse.com/#search=innerText
    • marknadal 10y ago
      Oh hmmm, I thought I tried it just the other month and it wasn't working. Maybe I hadn't updated IE, but I thought it was the whole Edge/11 split problem. Thanks for correcting me!
• jhall1468 10y ago
  This is especially true if you want to apply for a job some day. Programming interviews are going to expect plain old javascript, not a framework-oriented approach. More importantly, jQuery is a tool. Know what you're making before you bother with a tool that makes it easier.
  • lazyasciiart 10y ago
    Not the programming interviews I've been in (on both sides).