4 ms·
There's no evidence of the union activity to prevent this crane from being used. There's an awful lot of unsubstantiated leading the reader to conclude this. Th
by bobwaycott 10y ago
There's no evidence of the union activity to prevent this crane from being used. There's an awful lot of unsubstantiated leading the reader to conclude this. There is a very strong anti-union bias throughout the article, with zero support for the allegations and finger-pointing. But it's well done, because you're really blaming the union by the end, even though there's no proof.
- BinaryIdiot 10y ago> because you're really blaming the union by the end, even though there's no proof. I did no such thing. A `TL;DR` is typically a summation of an article. The primary narrative in the article was the union stifling this businessman. Whether it's true or not doesn't really effect a summary of the content itself. To openly state a summary without including the primary narrative of the article seems disingenuous to the article you're summarizing, in my opinion.
- bobwaycott 10y agoI meant "you're" in the universal sense as a reader. In my opinion, a tl;dr that glosses over pointing out the unsubstantiated crux of an article's narrative is a major disservice. It's fine to sum up the narrative. It's just as disingenuous to fail to point out the narrative lacks evidentiary support whatsoever.
- BinaryIdiot 10y agoFair enough