3 ms·
Maybe the Mozilla board was completely happy with his choice until it became public, and meant that his role would compromise fundraising and other interaction
by angry_octet 10y ago
Maybe the Mozilla board was completely happy with his choice until it became public, and meant that his role would compromise fundraising and other interaction expected of a CEO.
For this guy that reason doesn't apply, and he doesn't have any supervisory responsibility. I can't see why on the facts available that this would have happened, and I can't be help think there is something more.
- peterwwillis 10y agoAre there any facts available? Maybe I missed them. So far all I've read is a post saying this guy's values conflict with Drupal's.
- angry_octet 10y agoBy definition the decision is made in the facts available to the decision maker and those with statutory responsibilities. This does not include you or HN. The court of public opinion has no method of adjudicating facts anyway.