3 ms·
In that case, we are just transferring artistic control from one human into another. In the past recording audio had fairly little artistic control and the subj
by Cerium 10y ago
In that case, we are just transferring artistic control from one human into another. In the past recording audio had fairly little artistic control and the subjects of the recording most of the control. Now with better audio manipulation software the person doing the recording has artistic tools at their disposal. They are the 'photographers' of the scene, while the singer is the subject.
- kazinator 10y agoThat's right, and the subject might as well be a dog, or any other audio signal source, just like anything that reflects light can be a suitable one for the photographer's creative process. Cute puppies; water lilies; sunsets ... The thing is, I somehow don't hear the studio's creative input either when I hear the latest auto-tuned Fido or Bowser. They're just applying some automatic something that's supposed to make the dog sound like a more able dog. This is like when people just batch apply the same color enhancement and sharpening of their Florida vacation pictures. I've seen one instance, I've seen them all.