3 ms·
Did we read the same article? You excluded what the current crane operator union was doing to prevent this thing from being used which seemed like the meat of t
by BinaryIdiot 10y ago
Did we read the same article? You excluded what the current crane operator union was doing to prevent this thing from being used which seemed like the meat of the article to me.
- tbirrell 10y agoI was more answering the question in the clickbait-ish title then trying to summarize the entire article.
- bobwaycott 10y agoThere's no evidence of the union activity to prevent this crane from being used. There's an awful lot of unsubstantiated leading the reader to conclude this. There is a very strong anti-union bias throughout the article, with zero support for the allegations and finger-pointing. But it's well done, because you're really blaming the union by the end, even though there's no proof.
- BinaryIdiot 10y ago> because you're really blaming the union by the end, even though there's no proof. I did no such thing. A `TL;DR` is typically a summation of an article. The primary narrative in the article was the union stifling this businessman. Whether it's true or not doesn't really effect a summary of the content itself. To openly state a summary without including the primary narrative of the article seems disingenuous to the article you're summarizing, in my opinion.
- bobwaycott 10y agoI meant "you're" in the universal sense as a reader. In my opinion, a tl;dr that glosses over pointing out the unsubstantiated crux of an article's narrative is a major disservice. It's fine to sum up the narrative. It's just as disingenuous to fail to point out the narrative lacks evidentiary support whatsoever.
- BinaryIdiot 10y agoFair enough