Sure. The question gets fuzzier when you publish on something like the WSJ that has a reach of millions. Example: If an anti-vaxxer published their opinion in

Sure. The question gets fuzzier when you publish on something like the WSJ that has a reach of millions. Example: If an anti-vaxxer published their opinion in a private blog, you'd probably be OK with their speech (as misguided as it is). If the same person started promoting their "opinion" using a national newspaper, you'd be a lot more upset. Moreover, it's documented that the WAJ article authors went after PDP's livelihood directly (they contacted youtube and Disney, PDP's sponsor) with their allegations and were successful when Disney dropped PDP and Youtube cancelled PDP's new show!