3 ms·
I think you may be on to something here. I bet it was a data based decision...
by arca_vorago 10y ago
I think you may be on to something here. I bet it was a data based decision...
- jasonvorhe 10y agoReader didn't have enough active users to keep it running.
- dublinben 10y agoReader didn't have enough active employees to keep it running. Nobody inside Google worked on it any more, so it was just a zombie product running on inertia.
- naravara 10y agoReader's active users, though, tended to be influencers who read a lot and shared what they read with their friends on social media. So they still drove traffic, just by a different mechanism. Many of the people I followed on Reader moved to Twitter after Google took it down and mimicked its social functions there. I'd wager they're still either using RSS readers or jury-rigging Twitter into being something like it.
- someguydave 10y agoYeah I wonder if Google realized that people were reading long form content (much of it hosted off Google) without ads. Thus their own audience was being shunted off-site without revenue. That interpretation only makes sense if you think Google would rather have more good little click monkeys than organizing good content...
- arca_vorago 10y agoFrom the lack of quality search results and the infestation of ads if you don't use an adblocker, I don't think that interpretation would be too far fetched.