6 ms·
So, you think this http://i.imgur.com/MAy4Pgl.jpg http://i.imgur.com/MAy4Pgl.jpg is more legible than this http://i.imgur.com/xrBPKda.jpg http://i.imgur.com/xrB
by Tossrock 10y ago
So, you think this http://i.imgur.com/MAy4Pgl.jpg http://i.imgur.com/MAy4Pgl.jpg is more legible than this http://i.imgur.com/xrBPKda.jpg http://i.imgur.com/xrBPKda.jpg ? I disagree! And Starcraft 2 has a fixed isometric viewpoint. While it is technically possible to move the camera, no one ever does that in a real game.
- wruza 10y agoYou are comparing ultralisk-backed battle in psy storm with a pair of protoss not even started to evaporate few zerglings.
- TulliusCicero 10y agoThat's a really unfair comparison, there's way more going on in a tight space in the BW pic. Especially since if anything dense clustering of units is way more common in SC2 because the pathing is more efficient.
- theandrewbailey 10y agoBrood war has more contrast than SC2. SC2 relies more on color to distinguish things, but BW uses brightness, which human vision is more sensitive to. I much prefer the BW shot.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoSC1 has less eyecandy and less random moving things; I find it much easier to focus on SC1 game than on SC2 one. I might be biased though; I spent much more time in SC1 than in SC2.
- spicytunacone 10y agoSibling comments already made good points, but the BW screenshot isn't actually in-game view, either. The mini-map adds to the noise and the shot is smaller. I don't know if the SC2 one is in-game with the HUD removed as well.
- fuckthis 10y agoA few air units and zerglings to the biggest ground units in the game... Even the anti Broodwar fanboys can't get their hatred of it right.