2 ms·
It seems to me it's extremely clear from the first paragraph - it's supposed to be better the pgagent, and the second paragraph lists all the new features that
by Illniyar 10y ago
It seems to me it's extremely clear from the first paragraph - it's supposed to be better the pgagent, and the second paragraph lists all the new features that make it better then pgagent.
- RangerScience 10y agoIt's unclear because the second paragraph is about why the replacement is compatible with pgAgent, literally, "The reason for..." - not that it is a replacement. It could also be a replacement for something else that runs on top of pgAgent, or something else that doesn't, and one of the features is that this is compatible. Does that make sense?