> I always thought that putting the blame on actual agents instead of stuff is the direct opposite of being evasive. Well I meant evasive argument as in statem

> I always thought that putting the blame on actual agents instead of stuff is the direct opposite of being evasive. Well I meant evasive argument as in statements which directly avoid the question. Because the thing is, we don't live in a perfect world. So putting the blame on agents doesn't solve the problem. That's why I brought up that sometimes things have to be taken away from people. The question is when and how. > The bad act done with the weapon was giving it to a child I didn't say the adult gave the weapon. I just said the adult left it within the reach of the child. One is direct, the other is indirect. I wouldn't even say indirect, but lets go with it. > I'd point at the attacker It gets blurry deciding who the attacker is, depending on whose side you are on. Things aren't always so clear.