3 ms·
This one of the many reasons why self-driving cars are such a hard problem though. They don't just have to drive better than humans based on knowing the road an
by mwfunk 10y ago
This one of the many reasons why self-driving cars are such a hard problem though. They don't just have to drive better than humans based on knowing the road and the conditions, they also have to deal with other drivers (who are perhaps also automated) behaving in unexpected ways. Self-driving cars have to be robust even when (especially when) normal assumptions about the road or other drivers aren't valid.
This isn't tangential to the engineering problems surrounding self-driving cars, rather it's at the heart of those problems and why it's an order of magnitude (or more) harder than what so many people assume. It's not insurmountable, but whenever I hear people making comments like "self-driving cars are a solved problem, and are an inevitability in the near future", I cringe so hard. With a lot of care and skepticism, we can all make self-driving cars a thing in our lifetimes. Or, with a lot of overenthusiastic credulousness, we can make self-driving cars briefly a thing in the very near future, which get regulated out of existence for the remainder of our lives by a relatively small number of high-profile accidents like this.
- emiliobumachar 10y agoI agree with you about the hardness of the self driving car problem. But I think your other point about the inevitability of regulators killing self driving cars if they are short of perfect is just as cringe-worthy, as at least as harmful. Self-driving cars should be allowed to roll if they are better than humans, which might be the case already. It is hard, but not impossible, for government to do the right thing.