3 ms·
I see this all the time. No regard for mobile users that are paying for data plans. To me the big reason to have ad-blocker is data, not just UX. I'm focused o
by donohoe 10y ago
I see this all the time. No regard for mobile users that are paying for data plans. To me the big reason to have ad-blocker is data, not just UX.
I'm focused on getting a mobile article page down from 20+ seconds on 4G with 300+ requests and page-weight of 2MB+ (mostly ads).
Right now, on CI environment it is averaging 2.1s, 350K in size, <45 requests, and no ads in the initial view.
Sadly, Hearst doesn't own the LAT so it won't help them.
- x0x0 10y agoSince you're paying them nothing at all, it's not exactly like you're a customer, is it? I'm not sure why regard for people offering to pay them nothing at all would be a high priority for the LA Times, but ymmv.