4 ms·
Agreed Except my 5 person company could save $46,000!!!! and regain 279 hours! Numbers like this would make most managers BS detectors go off they're almost w
by mikeryan 16y ago
Agreed
Except my 5 person company could save $46,000!!!! and regain 279 hours!
Numbers like this would make most managers BS detectors go off they're almost worse then no numbers at all.
- jseeba 16y agoThat's why it so significant that you can easily change the underlying assumptions (which updates the $$/time calculations). It was a good counter to the BS meter that initially went off in my head too.
- mikeryan 16y agoyeah none of those levers really do much for me.
- Vivtek 16y agoYeah, my 1-person company could save $32,000 - how, they don't really say. That would be amazing, since my software licensing costs for the year are nil.
- julio_the_squid 16y agoYou have to click the 'assumptions' on the upper left. It seems that vast figure is generated by comparing to Microsoft Exchange, including sysadmin time. http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/messaging_value.html http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/messaging_value.... Also, it appears that in various 'assumptions' on this site, it is ignoring the total number of people working for the company. When you edit assumptions in one part, it reads... How many people work at <company>? 1 [...] Think of the last time you worked on a group project. How many people were on that team? 10 [...] What percentage of <company> employees use laptops? 60% So, apparently 10 times as many people worked on the last project as were employed by the company in total, and .6 of one employee uses a laptop.