4 ms·
Lovely! But the real champagne opener is when certain mainstream compilers completely support all features. PS. Please don't forget to show some love for C2x n
by kensai 10y ago
Lovely! But the real champagne opener is when certain mainstream compilers completely support all features.
PS. Please don't forget to show some love for C2x now. :D
- pjmlp 10y agoMy utopic dream for C2x would be official data structures for safe arrays and strings, alongside some standard way to enable bounds checking on processors like Intel and Sparc ones. The security annex is worthless, as pointers and lengths are still used separately.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- shakna 10y agoGCC [0] is pretty much done. Clang [1] needs a couple more things. MSVC [2] hasn't done as much, but shouldn't be too far away. [3]. Considering how long C++11 took before it was fully implemented, this seems so fast! [0] https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx1z https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx1z [1] http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html [2] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx [3] https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/01/22/vs-2015-update-2s-stl-is-c17-so-far-feature-complete/ https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/01/22/vs-2015-u...