5 ms·

Big Pharm and meat-based diet do a lot more harm to the entire biosphere and individuals than Ayurvedic medicine and yoga. Don't even get me started. I don't k

Big Pharm and meat-based diet do a lot more harm to the entire biosphere and individuals than Ayurvedic medicine and yoga. Don't even get me started. I don't know much about Eastern medicine outside of India to be honest. One exception: Chinese people buy tiger bone Viagra, elephant tusk art, rhino horn something, and shark fin soup. I was born Hindu but became closer to Buddhist as I learned more about the scientific revolution and how it built the modern world.

E6300 10y ago
> Big Pharm and meat-based diet do a lot more harm to the entire biosphere and individuals than Ayurvedic medicine and yoga. Cars kill more people per year than heroin, therefore heroin is healthier than cars. Let's wait until pseudo-scientific treatments become multi-billion dollar industries and then we'll talk about what does more harm to what.
- good_vibes 10y ago
  I'm not talking about pseudo-scientific anything dude. 1.) A meat-based diet is directly linked to higher cancer rates. "The World Health Organization has determined that dietary factors account for at least 30 percent of all cancers in Western countries and up to 20 percent in developing countries. When cancer researchers started to search for links between diet and cancer, one of the most noticeable findings was that people who avoided meat were much less likely to develop the disease. Large studies in England and Germany showed that vegetarians were about 40 percent less likely to develop cancer compared to meat eaters." http://www.pcrm.org/health/cancer-resources/diet-cancer/facts/meat-consumption-and-cancer-risk http://www.pcrm.org/health/cancer-resources/diet-cancer/fact... 2.) A meat-based diet is directly linked to clearing wild habitat for more farm animals. "Both the meat-based average American diet and the lactoovovegetarian diet require significant quantities of nonrenewable fossil energy to produce. Thus, both food systems are not sustainable in the long term based on heavy fossil energy requirements. However, the meat-based diet requires more energy, land, and water resources than the lactoovovegetarian diet. In this limited sense, the lactoovovegetarian diet is more sustainable than the average American meat-based diet. The major threat to future survival and to US natural resources is rapid population growth. The US population of 285 million is projected to double to 570 million in the next 70 y, which will place greater stress on the already-limited supply of energy, land, and water resources. These vital resources will have to be divided among ever greater numbers of people." http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/78/3/660S.full http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/78/3/660S.full 3.) U.S. eats more meat than any nation on Earth and also has the most expensive health care in the world too, 20% of the GPD. We have a society whose delusions cause diseases and destruction around the world. If I was wrong, there wouldn't be so many brilliant scientists, doctors, artists, and entrepreneurs on this same train of thought. 4.) Yoga, meditation, plant-based diet have all played a major part in creating the modern world including computers and the internet. If people don't have discernment to know true from false, that is their shortcoming and not Dharma. ;)
  - E6300 10y ago
    You have not addressed my counter-argument. I'm not interested in defending "meat-based diets". I'm simply attacking your pseudo-medicine. > We have a society whose delusions cause diseases and destruction around the world. If I was wrong, there wouldn't be so many brilliant scientists, doctors, artists, and entrepreneurs on this same train of thought. Argumentum ad populum. > Yoga, meditation, plant-based diet have all played a major part in creating [...] computers and the internet. This is probably the most absurd statement I've read all week.
    - good_vibes 10y ago
      "Your pseudo-medicine"? lol. I never claimed anything as mine and last I checked Indians are very involved in the medical field. I'm not interested in discussing this with you, I have work to do. Things don't have to be this or that, they can be both. You obviously are looking for an argument because you missed my original points in the original comment. You obviously don't know your Bay Area history. ;)
      - E6300 10y ago
        "Your" as in "the one you brought up". What does history or the Bay Area have to do with this discussion?
        good_vibes 10y ago
        What did I bring up again? I'm confused what this about at this point. I feel like you are trying to create cognitive dissonance where there is none. Read these: https://www.amazon.com/What-Dormouse-Said-Counterculture-Personal/dp/0143036769 https://www.amazon.com/What-Dormouse-Said-Counterculture-Per... https://www.amazon.com/Counterculture-Cyberculture-Stewart-Network-Utopianism/dp/0226817423/ref=pd_sbs_14_t_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=P8WD2R0AWAJ1KFMKGYD1 https://www.amazon.com/Counterculture-Cyberculture-Stewart-N...
        E6300 10y ago
jdietrich 10y ago
Meat is unarguably bad, but the pharmaceuticals industry is the closest thing we have to a miracle factory. It has spared us from the miseries of polio, tuberculosis, smallpox, AIDS, surgery without anaesthetic and a thousand other horrors. Diseases that were once death sentences are now treatable with medications that cost pennies. Countless millions of lives have been saved by vaccination. Ayurvedic medicine clearly does more harm than good. It has never been shown to be significantly more effective than placebo. Ayurveda poses a major risk of heavy metal poisoning, due to the pseudoscientific theories of rasa shastra. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755247/
- arjo129 10y ago
  Not all ayurvedic medicine require heavy metals. There are herbs like boswellia (now also an allopathic drug) that genuinely do what they are supposed to do. Ayurveda, prevented black death in India. Granted there is a lot of bs out there that gets passed of but there are parts that do work. Distilling these parts is important. I think the lack of quality control in eastern medicine is what has given it a bad name. Granted we don't have antibiotics or anti cancer drugs but there were surgical procedures like rhinoplasty that were successfully carried out. Of course any medicine that is 2000 years old is going to be nowhere near what modern medicine is because we have had 2000 years to evolve it. Reason why easterners set store by it is it provided a bit more protection than what the doctors of medieval Europe could do. 1000years is a long time and lots changes, sadly eastern medicine didn't.
- good_vibes 10y ago
  I should explain more clearly that I am all for Western and Eastern medicine finding a middle path. What I am against and referring to is how agribusiness, poor nutrition, clever marketing, and healthcare (mostly disease-care) create a lot of needless suffering. A lot of prescriptions are only there to take care of health problems that could have been prevented with proper nutrition and a more integrated, instead of reductionist, model for medicine. I think I should explain my thoughts on HN a little clearer going forward.
jernfrost 10y ago
Modern medicine, big Pharma and meat based diets are orthogonal to each other. Modern medicine has saved hundreds of millions of lives, while alternative medicine is leading people astray and ruining lives every day. Sorry for the harsh words, but I've seen the damage, and I am tired of how alternative medicine is handled with silk gloves and shown infinite respect, in the name of being open minded.
- good_vibes 10y ago
  A, you're wrong. Diet, healthcare, and pharmaceuticals are very interconnected. Also, adding pollution and climate change in there as well when you count land/water use and greenhouse gases produced by factory farming. Add advertising and lobbying in there as well, it's so effective you still think you're right. B, the original comment was focused on taking what works from both and leaving the rest behind. You're making the same mistake as a billion other people...clinging to the paradigm you are currently in thinking there is nothing beyond it. C, I'm tired of people thinking they are smart because they used the word 'orthogonal' and say things like 'sorry for the harsh words bro', which doesn't apply in this context and this is a pretty typical reddit/HN thread. Do you have any original insights into any of this or are you just gonna drop more vocab words and 'harsh words'?

E6300 10y ago

> Big Pharm and meat-based diet do a lot more harm to the entire biosphere and individuals than Ayurvedic medicine and yoga. Cars kill more people per year than heroin, therefore heroin is healthier than cars. Let's wait until pseudo-scientific treatments become multi-billion dollar industries and then we'll talk about what does more harm to what.

good_vibes 10y ago
I'm not talking about pseudo-scientific anything dude. 1.) A meat-based diet is directly linked to higher cancer rates. "The World Health Organization has determined that dietary factors account for at least 30 percent of all cancers in Western countries and up to 20 percent in developing countries. When cancer researchers started to search for links between diet and cancer, one of the most noticeable findings was that people who avoided meat were much less likely to develop the disease. Large studies in England and Germany showed that vegetarians were about 40 percent less likely to develop cancer compared to meat eaters." http://www.pcrm.org/health/cancer-resources/diet-cancer/facts/meat-consumption-and-cancer-risk http://www.pcrm.org/health/cancer-resources/diet-cancer/fact... 2.) A meat-based diet is directly linked to clearing wild habitat for more farm animals. "Both the meat-based average American diet and the lactoovovegetarian diet require significant quantities of nonrenewable fossil energy to produce. Thus, both food systems are not sustainable in the long term based on heavy fossil energy requirements. However, the meat-based diet requires more energy, land, and water resources than the lactoovovegetarian diet. In this limited sense, the lactoovovegetarian diet is more sustainable than the average American meat-based diet. The major threat to future survival and to US natural resources is rapid population growth. The US population of 285 million is projected to double to 570 million in the next 70 y, which will place greater stress on the already-limited supply of energy, land, and water resources. These vital resources will have to be divided among ever greater numbers of people." http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/78/3/660S.full http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/78/3/660S.full 3.) U.S. eats more meat than any nation on Earth and also has the most expensive health care in the world too, 20% of the GPD. We have a society whose delusions cause diseases and destruction around the world. If I was wrong, there wouldn't be so many brilliant scientists, doctors, artists, and entrepreneurs on this same train of thought. 4.) Yoga, meditation, plant-based diet have all played a major part in creating the modern world including computers and the internet. If people don't have discernment to know true from false, that is their shortcoming and not Dharma. ;)
- E6300 10y ago
  You have not addressed my counter-argument. I'm not interested in defending "meat-based diets". I'm simply attacking your pseudo-medicine. > We have a society whose delusions cause diseases and destruction around the world. If I was wrong, there wouldn't be so many brilliant scientists, doctors, artists, and entrepreneurs on this same train of thought. Argumentum ad populum. > Yoga, meditation, plant-based diet have all played a major part in creating [...] computers and the internet. This is probably the most absurd statement I've read all week.
  - good_vibes 10y ago
    "Your pseudo-medicine"? lol. I never claimed anything as mine and last I checked Indians are very involved in the medical field. I'm not interested in discussing this with you, I have work to do. Things don't have to be this or that, they can be both. You obviously are looking for an argument because you missed my original points in the original comment. You obviously don't know your Bay Area history. ;)
    - E6300 10y ago
      "Your" as in "the one you brought up". What does history or the Bay Area have to do with this discussion?
      - good_vibes 10y ago
        What did I bring up again? I'm confused what this about at this point. I feel like you are trying to create cognitive dissonance where there is none. Read these: https://www.amazon.com/What-Dormouse-Said-Counterculture-Personal/dp/0143036769 https://www.amazon.com/What-Dormouse-Said-Counterculture-Per... https://www.amazon.com/Counterculture-Cyberculture-Stewart-Network-Utopianism/dp/0226817423/ref=pd_sbs_14_t_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=P8WD2R0AWAJ1KFMKGYD1 https://www.amazon.com/Counterculture-Cyberculture-Stewart-N...
        E6300 10y ago

jdietrich 10y ago

Meat is unarguably bad, but the pharmaceuticals industry is the closest thing we have to a miracle factory. It has spared us from the miseries of polio, tuberculosis, smallpox, AIDS, surgery without anaesthetic and a thousand other horrors. Diseases that were once death sentences are now treatable with medications that cost pennies. Countless millions of lives have been saved by vaccination. Ayurvedic medicine clearly does more harm than good. It has never been shown to be significantly more effective than placebo. Ayurveda poses a major risk of heavy metal poisoning, due to the pseudoscientific theories of rasa shastra. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755247/

arjo129 10y ago
Not all ayurvedic medicine require heavy metals. There are herbs like boswellia (now also an allopathic drug) that genuinely do what they are supposed to do. Ayurveda, prevented black death in India. Granted there is a lot of bs out there that gets passed of but there are parts that do work. Distilling these parts is important. I think the lack of quality control in eastern medicine is what has given it a bad name. Granted we don't have antibiotics or anti cancer drugs but there were surgical procedures like rhinoplasty that were successfully carried out. Of course any medicine that is 2000 years old is going to be nowhere near what modern medicine is because we have had 2000 years to evolve it. Reason why easterners set store by it is it provided a bit more protection than what the doctors of medieval Europe could do. 1000years is a long time and lots changes, sadly eastern medicine didn't.
good_vibes 10y ago
I should explain more clearly that I am all for Western and Eastern medicine finding a middle path. What I am against and referring to is how agribusiness, poor nutrition, clever marketing, and healthcare (mostly disease-care) create a lot of needless suffering. A lot of prescriptions are only there to take care of health problems that could have been prevented with proper nutrition and a more integrated, instead of reductionist, model for medicine. I think I should explain my thoughts on HN a little clearer going forward.

jernfrost 10y ago

Modern medicine, big Pharma and meat based diets are orthogonal to each other. Modern medicine has saved hundreds of millions of lives, while alternative medicine is leading people astray and ruining lives every day. Sorry for the harsh words, but I've seen the damage, and I am tired of how alternative medicine is handled with silk gloves and shown infinite respect, in the name of being open minded.

good_vibes 10y ago
A, you're wrong. Diet, healthcare, and pharmaceuticals are very interconnected. Also, adding pollution and climate change in there as well when you count land/water use and greenhouse gases produced by factory farming. Add advertising and lobbying in there as well, it's so effective you still think you're right. B, the original comment was focused on taking what works from both and leaving the rest behind. You're making the same mistake as a billion other people...clinging to the paradigm you are currently in thinking there is nothing beyond it. C, I'm tired of people thinking they are smart because they used the word 'orthogonal' and say things like 'sorry for the harsh words bro', which doesn't apply in this context and this is a pretty typical reddit/HN thread. Do you have any original insights into any of this or are you just gonna drop more vocab words and 'harsh words'?