4 ms·
I didn't read it that way. The issue was with the handling of the boxes and not the contents. The box itself was the artwork in addition to the contents. Slicin
by rabboRubble 10y ago
I didn't read it that way. The issue was with the handling of the boxes and not the contents. The box itself was the artwork in addition to the contents. Slicing the tape sliced the box and the box was insured for EUR25k.
"cuts through the tape that seals all the boxes. Each box a artwork, insured for 25.000€ - sliced."
- pavel_lishin 10y ago> The box itself was the artwork in addition to the contents. That's not how I read it (emphasis mine): > One of those haulers venturing into art, transported a artwork by a Chinese artists (do not know the name), basically very long paperrolls with Chinese letters on them to be hung from a halls ceiling
- rabboRubble 10y agoI love this! I initially assumed your understanding was what s/he meant too but the wording in the last sentence caused me to think the boxes were also art. We are having the exact problem described in the article. Is the bench a bench or an art? Is the gigantic crossword puzzle a puzzle to be completed, or a work that should never be written on? Is the box a box, or an art? Regardless of the answer, tape never should be used or cut carelessly :-)
- pavel_lishin 10y agoI want to print out this thread, put it in a frame, and tack it onto a museum wall. (Hello, museum visitor. You are now part of this art exhibit. Please refrain from touching yourself.)