3 ms·
Any engineers familiar with DSC 1.2 care to comment on how the required compression to support 8K@60Hz over DP 1.4 could presumably manifest undesirable artifac
by metaphor 10y ago
Any engineers familiar with DSC 1.2 care to comment on how the required compression to support 8K@60Hz over DP 1.4 could presumably manifest undesirable artifacts (for lack of a better analogy) which would run counter to the reasons that would make this high-end display attractive from a productivity perspective? I initially thought this would be a vanilla lossless frame transaction, but that's apparently not the case. If imperfections aren't perceivable at 32", I'm curious how they'll visually manifest (if at all) as display size scales up.
Wiki[1] notes that DSC is visually lossless per ISO/IEC 29170-2 test method, but I'm neither familiar with DSC nor the ISO/IEC standard. What are the practical implications of calibrating against a $200+ colorimeter accessory that Dell is so intent on adding to your cart?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort#Display_Stream_Compression https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort#Display_Stream_Com...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]