Right, isn't the term "reasonable accommodations" from ADA language? I'm still at a bit of a loss as to the functional impact. I understand the monetary argume

Right, isn't the term "reasonable accommodations" from ADA language? I'm still at a bit of a loss as to the functional impact. I understand the monetary argument in the first paragraph, there are similar laws pertaining to educational material funding and accessibility such as CA EDU 60119[1] which requires access to all students all primary education materials BOTH at home and in the classroom. But I'm still struggling to understand how this will functionally change anything? I guess I'm wondering if there is a measurable mandate for anything other than what could hypothetically be "superficial change" to accommodate the language of the supreme court. []1http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf/textedcod60119.asp http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf/textedcod60119.asp