3 ms·
I guess what I mean is that if you look at the the public page, Sublime Text 3 haven't had a release in half a year, and digging into the forums to discover if
by e_proxus 10y ago
I guess what I mean is that if you look at the the public page, Sublime Text 3 haven't had a release in half a year, and digging into the forums to discover if the project is alive is not what what everyone will do. I also don't think it's clear who's on the team for outside people.
I've thought about contributing to the Erlang syntax a couple of times. Is a rewrite in the new syntax format of any interest or do you want to keep compatibility with TextMate still?
- wbond 10y agoThanks for the feedback! I'll talk to Jon about trying to make the website push people to the forum to see what is going on. We no longer keep compatibility with TextMate in any of the default syntaxes. Everything is now a .sublime-syntax, and has access to all of the advanced stack and scope manipulation features. If you are interested in providing feedback, the packages are at https://github.com/sublimehq/Packages https://github.com/sublimehq/Packages. Tests could be helpful, even if failing. The test syntax is described at http://www.sublimetext.com/docs/3/syntax.html#testing http://www.sublimetext.com/docs/3/syntax.html#testing and scope naming guidelines at http://www.sublimetext.com/docs/3/scope_naming.html http://www.sublimetext.com/docs/3/scope_naming.html.