10 ms·
There is probably a non-trivial amount of astroturfing here, but also software developers are people too, and people get dogmatic about their opinions. I proba
by daliwali 10y ago
There is probably a non-trivial amount of astroturfing here, but also software developers are people too, and people get dogmatic about their opinions.
I probably won't ever use Angular unless I find myself desperate for work and can't find anything else. The problem I see inherent in frameworks is that they are all dogmatic about their opinions, and thus criticism of frameworks often do boil down to "I don't agree with their opinion", sometimes with rationalizations mixed in.
Preferences aside, Angular is objectively one of, if not the most, heaviest frameworks for web front-ends. It is not just a matter of bandwidth to the end user, but also a lot of magic under the hood that developers have to deal with. Consider the Java mindset that may have inspired Angular, people don't want to deal with that level of verbosity and enterprise mentality.
Unfortunately, there are increasingly few employment options if you want to use anything other than React or Angular. So rather than framing this argument in terms of framework hate, consider it a problem that lots of developers are forced to use these frameworks in order to be more like easily replaceable cogs in a machine, or be unemployed.
- throwasehasdwi 10y agogiven that both frameworks are open source I highly doubt any astroturfing on either side. I think what you're seeing is a bunch of developers riled up :)
- daliwali 10y agoHow ironic is that comment coming from a throwaway account... Given that both frameworks are products of multi-billion-dollar corporations, used mostly in commercial applications, and keep a fair number of people employed, I think it's a bit more than just getting riled up.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]